The following guidelines have been established to maintain a high standard of quality and accuracy for all types of publication material submitted to the online repository. Adhering to these protocols ensures that the content is reliable, and credible, and contributes meaningfully to the body of knowledge.
The submissions should be in a standardised format, including title, abstract, introduction, methodology section, results, discussion, and references. Proper citation of sources is essential, adhering to recognised academic referencing styles.
Researchers should affirm that their work
adheres to ethical standards, including
respect for human rights, consent, and
protection of vulnerable populations.
Submissions will undergo rigorous
plagiarism checks. Any instance of
plagiarism may lead to rejection of the
methodology.
Review process
All submissions will be subject to a peer-review process. Reviewers will evaluate the methodology’s quality, originality, clarity, and contribution to the field.
Reviewer guidelines
Reviewers should provide constructive, specific
feedback, focusing on strengths and areas for
improvement. Confidentiality of the review
process must be maintained.
Revision cycle
Authors may be required to revise and resubmit based on reviewer feedback. Each revision should be clearly documented.
By adhering to these guidelines and protocols,
researchers contribute to the integrity and academic
rigor of the online repository.
The repository aims to be a trusted resource for quality
research methodologies in the field of climate change
and its human impacts.