- Loss and Damage Research Observatory
- admin@lossanddamageobservatory.org
| Time | Segment | Proposed lead / speaker | Focus |
|---|---|---|---|
| Welcoming remarks | |||
| 15:00–15:02 | Welcome and framing | Ritu Bharadwaj, IIED, moderator | Introduce the central question: how can Earth Observation become a sustained national policymaking capability and how can successful applications and lessons travel across borders? |
| 15:02–15:08 | COP31 host-country perspective | Ms. Fatma Varank, Deputy Minister, Ministry of Environment, Urbanization and Climate Change of Türkiye | Position evidence, innovation and international cooperation within the COP31 implementation context. |
| 15:08–15:11 | UN system and national implementation | Mr. Babatunde Ahonsi, United Nations Resident Coordinator’s Office in Türkiye | National ownership, coherent UN support, SDG implementation and multistakeholder partnerships. |
| 15:11–15:15 | Triangular cooperation and ESA–UNOSSC partnership | Ms. Dima Al-Khatib, UNOSSC Director | Frame South-South and triangular cooperation as a mechanism for enabling EO applications, expertise and lessons to travel across borders. Introduce the ESA–UNOSSC partnership and the Global Alliance. |
| 15:15–15:20 | Earth Observation for climate action and sustainable development | Simonetta Cheli, Director of Earth Observation Programmes, ESA | Strategic ESA perspective on EO for evidence-based policymaking; ESA–UNOSSC cooperation; national capacity development; and links to the wider Earth Information Day and systematic-observation agenda. |
| Presentations and interventions from partners: | |||
| 15:20–15:32 | From satellite observations to decision-ready information | ESA Global Development Assistance Programme Susanne Mecklenburg, Head of the Climate and Long-Term Action Division, Climate Action, Sustainability & Science Department |
Demonstrate how EO information can be translated into operational services and decision-ready evidence. Use two or three practical examples and highlight relevant ESA GDA resources and capabilities. |
| 15:32–15:42 | National case — Türkiye | Turkish national technical institution (Ministry of Environment) Dr. Cem GÜLLÜOĞLU, Head of Remote Sensing Department, Ministry of Environment, Urbanization and Climate Change, Türkiye |
Present a concrete climate or development challenge, the EO application or information involved, institutional use, capacity requirements and a lesson that may be relevant elsewhere. |
| 15:42–15:47 | National case 2 | Colombia / Guatemala or another participating institution | Practical application emphasizing the development or policy decision being supported and potential for cross-border learning. |
| 15:47–15:52 | National case 3 | Jamaica / Mauritius or another participating institution | SIDS, coastal/ocean resilience or another relevant national application. |
| 15:52–15:57 | Investment and finance perspective | Norio Saito, Deputy Director General, ADB | Explain how EO-derived evidence can support risk assessment, project preparation, investment prioritization and climate-finance decisions. |
| 15:57–16:10 | Innovation and capacity ecosystem | Dr. David Kolitzus, Head of Climate Department, GeoVille Information Systems and Data Prof. Tim Naish, Chair of the WCRP’s Joint Scientific Committee Dr. Bart van den Hurk, Scientific Director at Deltares and IPCC Working Group II Co-Chair |
Address skills, analytical methods, platforms, institutional partnerships and service models required for sustained national EO capacity. |
| 16:10–16:25 | Moderated dialogue: from Earth information to implementation | Moderator + speakers (2–3 additional questions) |
Explore what information decision-makers need; which national capacities remain missing; which applications are most transferable; what must be adapted locally; and how triangular partners can support institutionalization and scaling. |
| 16:25–16:30 | Joint closing | UNOSSC + ESA | Summarize principal messages and indicate follow-up through ESA–UNOSSC cooperation and the Global Alliance. |